🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on the island with a high participation. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.