🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to use a revised congressional map that could add several five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating significant confusion and upsetting the fine equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to employ the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a infraction of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

This decision is part of a national fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican control. Typically, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have countered with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees representation aligned with Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic leaders criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic figure argued the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.